More about Fountain
- All
- Info
- Video
- Shop
Contributor
Though Marcel Duchamp's original Fountain has been lost in the sands of time, the iconic urinal still begs a question for all ages:
“But…who says its art?”
To which Duchamp replies: “Bitch, I do. “
And that's evident by the thing's legacy. We are now left with numerous replicas of the porcelain piss pot. The signature on all these outrageous "sculptures" reads R. Mutt, a phrase that has become susceptible to various meanings.
- Some have concluded that it is a clever take on the name of this particular urinals manufacturer (Mott Plumbing).
- Others say it's a reference to the Mutt and Jeff comic strip that was popular at the time.
- There are also those who surmise that the title sounds a bit like the German word Armut which means poverty, or Urmutter which is German for great mother. This last stab at evaluation is my own personal favorite because the urinal also resembles an upside-down womb of sorts- Urmutter, indeed!
Avant-garde to the extreme, Duchamp submitted this, now most famous of his readymades, for an exhibition in 1917, but the committee dumped the work. Why? It’s a urinal, for Pete’s sake! How does that qualify as art??
In defense of Duchamp, here’s his own statement about the work published in 1917: “Whether Mr. Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new title and point of view—created a new thought for that object.”
Difficult to argue with that thought now. Clearly, a lot of people saw eye to eye eventually, because Fountain came to be voted the most influential artwork of the 20th century in 2004 by art world bigwigs. But more there have also been several occasions on which less reverent bladders have been emptied into this particular urinal. Some which qualify as performance art...and maybe others just really had to pee.
And if you're into the whole urine fetish, check out Andy Warhol's Oxidation paintings. Or go one step further (number 1 to number 2!) with Piero Manzoni's Merda d'Artisa, or "Artist's Shit".
Featured Content
Here is what Wikipedia says about Fountain (Duchamp)

Fountain is Marcel Duchamp's most publicized readymade existing primarily—if not exclusively—as a single photograph by Alfred Stieglitz published in the Dada review, The Blind Man, in the Spring of 1917. The image describes a porcelain urinal rotated 90 degrees, signed "R. Mutt 1917," and placed on a pedestal in front of Marsden Hartley's painting The Warriors. This photograph, rather than any physical object, is the core provocation of the readymade sculpture as Duchamp defined his readymade in terms of "an everyday object raised to the dignity of a work of art by the artist's act of choice." For its presentation in The Blind Man, Duchamp altered the urinal 90 degrees from its usual positioning. Following its removal from the Society of Independent Artists inaugural juried exhibition, where it was rejected by the hanging committee-- despite the society's open policy-- as sculpture, Duchamp took Fountain to Stieglitz' 291 gallery, had it photographed, and allegedly sold it to the collector Walter Arensberg, who lost it.
Technically, Fountain was not rejected by the committee, since Society rules stated that all works would be accepted from artists who paid the fee. The work was never placed in the show area but no evidence proves the urinal's actual delivery to the Society of Independent Artists either. There is also no record of the original ever having been exhibited prior to its authorization as replica, in an edition of eight by the art dealer Arturo Schwarz, under the close supervision of Duchamp, shortly before Duchamp's death in 1968. Contemporary accounts rely heavily on writings in The Blind Man, including Louise Norton's presentation of Fountain's submission and rejection, and on Duchamp's recollection of the real event.
21st century art historians presume the sculpture to have been lost or destroyed. Despite this, or because of it, Fountain is regarded by art historians and theorists as a major landmark in the 20th-century American avant-garde. In the late 1990's and early 2000's, historian Rhonda Roland Shearer, with the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, conducted extensive analysis of Fountain using historical prototypes, museum archives, and period plumbing catalogs. Their experiments show that no commercially manufactured urinal from 1917 matches the proportions, details, and perspective in Stieglitz's photograph—making it impossible to capture such an object from the precise angle and with the observed features using standard photography. The idea that the Steiglitz image is more likely a composite (assembled from multiple photographs at different scales/angles) than the object is a factory error, or the result of Duchamp's staged manipulation, has been met with as much controversy as Fountain itself. An empirical comparison of the 1917 image to the surviving replicas shows Duchamp's readymade to be non-obvious. Others maintain that the original work was by the female artist Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven who had submitted it to Duchamp as a friend.
Fountain is included in the Marcel Duchamp catalogue raisonné by Arturo Schwarz; The complete works of Marcel Duchamp (number 345).
Check out the full Wikipedia article about Fountain (Duchamp)